Legal Opinion

People v. Whipple

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Ingham; Person, J. Amos Whipple, impleaded with Edward Sedweek, was convicted of keeping a saloon open on a legal holiday.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

The respondents were prosecuted for keeping their saloon open on July 4, 1895. Respondent Whipple was convicted, and respondent Sedweek was discharged by order of the court.

*588Respondents were the keepers of a saloon in the village of Williamston, under the firm name of Sedweek & Whipple, and, as such, sold spirituous and other liquors usually kept in saloons. The saloon was on the first floor of a building leased by them for that parpóse. The rent of the entire building was paid from the joint proceeds of their business. On the lower floor, the front part was used as a cigar and tobacco room.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. RingstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KnopkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. RushMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. BowkusMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API