People v. Cox
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions taken before judgment from Jackson. (Gridley, J.) Respondent was convicted of not keeping bis saloon closed on Sunday. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The respondent kept a saloon in the city of Jackson, on Cortland street. He was not married, but hired a housekeeper, and his father lived with him. The rooms over the saloon were used as sleeping rooms. The first or lower story of the building was divided into rooms and halls as follows: First, a front room, known as the “bar-room,” with a front door, the only one opening upon the street from that room. A door in the back part of the bar-room opened into a hall. Upon the left of this hall was a card-room. Back of that another room used as a kitchen.
There were no doors from the outside into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. StubenvollMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. CummerfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. HigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Rosemary GibsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BarbaraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. RiveraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.