Legal Opinion

People v. Bowkus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Burlingame» J. William Bowkus was convicted of keeping his saloon open on Sunday.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The respondent was convicted of keeping his saloon open on Sunday. The next room back of his *361saloon proper was a sitting room, connected with the saloon by a door. Back of the sitting room was his dining room. The sleeping rooms of his family were upstairs. The evidence on behalf of the people was direct and positive that he entered his saloon on the day in question1 from the sitting room, through this door, drew beer by means of a pump from the kegs of beer in the cellar, and served it to customers in the sitting room. He admits serving beer in this room, but denies that he got it from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. WhippleMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitzsimmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. People v. TolmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People v. TalbotMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API