Legal Opinion

Welch v. Bombardieri

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 16, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiffs sue for damages caused by breach of an agreement to purchase three hundred and ten barrels of flour. They put in evidence a writing, Exhibit 1, bearing date September 15,1920, on a form called a “Re-sale Order” such as was used while the United States Food Administration was in control of the sale of foodstuffs, which set out that, subject to confirmation, the plaintiffs sold to the defendant for shipment within sixty days and delivery within three months at mill’s option, payment on arrival at Boston, two hundred and sixty barrels of Fairfax brand flour in ninety-eight pound…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Saltzman v. BarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Hebb v. WelshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Sound Techniques, Inc. v. HoffmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Bresky v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Alfred M. Johnston, Trustees v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API