Legal Opinion

Sound Techniques, Inc. v. Hoffman

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 3, 2000No. 98-P-1316PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

In Bates v. Southgate, 308 Mass. 170, 182 (1941), the court held that “contracts or clauses attempting to protect a party against the consequences of his own fraud are against public policy and void where fraud inducing the contract is shown . . . .” This appeal brings before us the question whether Bates applies with equal force when a party enters into a contract containing such a clause, commonly referred to as a merger clause, an integration clause, or an exculpatory clause, *426in reliance upon a negligent rather than deliberate misrepresentation. In this case, the lessee, Sound Techniques,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  4. Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  3. Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API