Sound Techniques, Inc. v. Hoffman
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
In Bates v. Southgate, 308 Mass. 170, 182 (1941), the court held that “contracts or clauses attempting to protect a party against the consequences of his own fraud are against public policy and void where fraud inducing the contract is shown . . . .” This appeal brings before us the question whether Bates applies with equal force when a party enters into a contract containing such a clause, commonly referred to as a merger clause, an integration clause, or an exculpatory clause, *426in reliance upon a negligent rather than deliberate misrepresentation. In this case, the lessee, Sound Techniques,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Rodi v. Southern New England School of LawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.