Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Discount Co. v. Asher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1917No. 20,582PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The Cincinnati Discount Company broüght this action against the Commercial National Bank at Hutchinson and A. E. Asher, its president, to recover money paid for alleged fictitious and worthless promissory notes purchased from J. J. Gouy, in reliance upon representations made by Asher as to Gouy’s standing. At the trial a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence interposed by the bank was sustained and. the cause proceeded as to the other defendant. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of one dollar, and the court set…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens' Central Nat. Bank of NY v. AppletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Haven v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. First National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Jackson v. City of HumboldtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. BrennekeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Allen County State Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Sparks v. Guaranty State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Daniels v. HansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. McCaslin v. Ellsworth Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API