Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1909No. 16,227PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The plaintiff took charge of the work of cleaning and repairing several houses of the defendant in Armourdale after the flood of June, 1903, and sued to recover the value of his services. The defendant, who is a brother of the plaintiff, contends that the services were to be gratuitous; that, being engaged to do similar work in the vicinity for their mother, the plaintiff undertook this work also, as a mere friendly service. Each party offered evidence tending to support his contention. The jury found for the plaintiff and assessed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haven v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. Young v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sundgren v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Fulmele v. ForrestSuperior Court of Delaware · 1913
  4. Bracken v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Bressler v. McVeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API