Legal Opinion

Winn-Senter Const. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 5, 1948No. 45999, 46592, 46593PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiffs made contracts with the Government to perform parts of the construction of the Cornhusker Ordnance Plant at Grand Island, Nebraska. The plaintiff in the first named suit had a separate contract, the plaintiff in the second named suit had two contracts and the two plaintiffs in the third named suit had, as joint contractors, two contracts. Each contract was a separate contract. The cases are treated together because the same findings of fact relate, in large partj to all of them, and the issues involved are, with exceptions that will be stated, the same.

All of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fennerstein's ChampagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Morrisdale Coal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Admiral Frank B. Kelso, Ii, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Willems Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API