United States v. Cutajar
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This was an action by the United States against William Cut-ajar and another upon a bond for $800 given pursuant to section 4 of the customs administrative act of June 10, 1890. In the district court, judgment was given for the plaintiff for $263.93. Plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The customs administrative act of June 10,1890, provides, in section 4 (26 Stat. 131, 132), for the entry of merchandise in the absence of a duly-certified invoice, and sets forth in detail the facts required to be stated upon affidavit to procure such entry. The section concludes with the provision:
“And when entry of merchandise exceeding one hundred dollars in value is made by a statement in the form of an invoice, the collector shall require a bond for the production of a duly certified invoice.”
*531On November 24, 1891, defendants, doing business in New York under the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Monroe-Goldkamp Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Gougar v. Buffalo Specialty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Dieckerhoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- Gougar v. Buffalo Specialty Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Menter & Rosenbloom Co. v. GrayOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.