Legal Opinion

Menter & Rosenbloom Co. v. Gray

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided July 1, 1907Published

1Opinion of the CourtHosea, J.

Heard on demurrer to amended petition.

Plaintiff sues as assignee of the firm of Menter, Rosenbloom & Company, to recover the one thousand dollars ($1,000) specified as a sum to be forfeited in and by a written contract of employment of defendant by plaintiff’s assignors, in case he engaged in a similar employment within four years.

The contract in question, dated July 25, 1899, so far as material to the present inquiry, is in substance as follows:

Gray agrees to work for said firm by the week, working days beginning at 7:3o a. m., and ending at 8:3o p. m., excepting Saturdays, on which days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. CutajarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API