Dieckerhoff v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, in favor of the United States, for $369.12 on a customs bond. Note United States v. Dieckerhoff (C. C.) 103 Fed. 789.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
On or about January 13, 1897, the plaintiffs’ firm imported seven cases of goods. The collector sent one of these packages, case 418, to the public stores, and delivered the remaining cases to the importers. Prior to this importation a bond for the delivery of unexamined packages, commonly known as-a “six months’ bond,” had been executed by these importers, with sureties. On or about January 18, 1897, the collector, having received a report from the appraiser, called upon the defendants to send case No. 420 to the public stores, which request was not complied with.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- United States v. ValensonaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1894
- United States v. CutajarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
- United States v. HatchU.S. Circuit Court for New York · 1824
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.