Legal Opinion

United States v. Monroe-Goldkamp Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1927No. 2789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bland, Judge,

delivered tlie opinion of the court:

The United States has appealed from the judgment of the Board of United States General Appraisers (now United States Customs Court), which sustained the importer’s protest against the demand and collection of $5, which, according to the contention of the Government, was collected as liquidated damages on account of appellee’s failure to comply with the conditions of the “term entry bond” given at the port of St. Louis, Mo., to insure the production to the collector of customs of all documents, and the compliance with all the conditions required…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. CutajarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  2. United States v. CutajarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Democrat-Herald Publishing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Thomas & Pierson, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  3. United States v. Frank F. Smith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  4. United States v. James P. Heffernan Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. United States v. WhelanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API