Foster v. Dravo Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Mr. Justice Marshall, announced by Mr. Chief Justice Burger.
Through the Military Selective Service Act, Congress has sought to protect veterans returning to civilian jobs from being penalized for having served in the Armed Forces. Section 9 of the Act, 62 Stat. 614, as amended, 50 U. S. C. App. § 459, ensures a returning serviceman the right to be restored to his job with the same levels of seniority, status, and pay that he would have enjoyed if he had held the job throughout the time he was in the military. This case presents the question whether the statute entitles…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Accardi v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monroe v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Coffy v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Upshur Coals Corporation v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.