Femrite v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellants challenge adverse summary judgment on various tort claims arising from injuries allegedly incurred as a result of spinal fusion surgery. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants Cary Femrite and Ruth Perkl underwent spinal fusion surgery that involved implantation with pedicle screw devices at respondent Abbott Northwestern Hospital (Abbott). In December 1989, Fem-rite was implanted with a screw device known as the “VSP” or “Stefee” system manufactured by AcroMed. In February 1990, Perkl was implanted with a screw device known as the “Cotrel Dubousset” manufactured by Sofamor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- No. 93-5555Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Weaver v. ReagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- D.A.B. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Bryant v. HCA Health Services of No. Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Paulos v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Blazoski v. CookNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.