Legal Opinion

D.A.B. v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 4, 1997No. C2-97-817PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This case arises out of a physician’s prescription for Protropin, a synthetic growth hormone drug. A putative class of patients and their parents sued the physician, drug manufacturer, and drug distributor for breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy to breach that duty, common law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 325F.68-.70 (1996). On appeal from a dismissal with prejudice, the putative class argues: (1) physicians should be subject to the law of fiduciaries, and (2) their complaint alleges…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Neade v. PortesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Noble Systems Corp. v. Alorica Central, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Pavlik v. KornhaberAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Blatz v. Allina Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API