Legal Opinion
Noble v. C.E.D.O., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 17, 1985No. C2-84-1952PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Huber and Mann appeal from the order for judgment dated May 23, 1984, an order dated September 19, 1984, and a judgment entered October 25, 1984. The May 23, 1984, order for judgment is nonappealable. Rule 103.03, Minn.R.Civ.App.P.; see also, Swicker v. Ryan, 346 N.W.2d 367, 368 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). However, the September 19, 1984, order and the judgment entered October 25, 1984, made within the proper time limits, are appealable. Huber and Mann appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions for amended findings, a new trial, or judgment notwithstanding the verdict…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Orwick v. BelshanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Commercial Associates, Inc. v. Work Connection, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Barry v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Baufield v. Safelite Glass Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Randall v. Lady of America Franchise Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.