Legal Opinion
State v. McAllister
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 3, 1987No. CX-86-1198PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Over the State’s objection the trial court accepted respondents’ Everette McAllister and Q.T., Inc. pleas to a lesser included offense. On appeal the State argues that the trial court erred in accepting respondents’ pleas under Minn.R.Crim.P. 15.07 based on manifest injustice; that Minn. Stat. § 115.071, subd. 2b (1984), is not unconstitutionally vague; that whether a substance is a hazardous waste is a question of law and that prosecution of the case did not constitute discriminatory enforcement. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Everette McAllister was the owner…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- State v. FavreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. StreiffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. Normandale Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.