Legal Opinion
State v. Normandale Properties, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 15, 1988No. C3-87-2106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Respondent Normandale Properties, Inc., (Normandale) was charged with two counts of attempted unlawful disposal of hazardous wastes. The trial court ruled that the statutory definition of hazardous waste was unconstitutionally vague and dismissed the complaint. The state appeals, and the attorney general has submitted an amicus curiae brief in support of the statute. We reverse.
FACTS
The complaint alleges the following facts. On April 7, 1987, a Carver County Environmental Services inspector responded to a report that someone was unlawfully attempting to dispose of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. ChristieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- In Re the Appeal of RocheleauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Cloyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.