Ford v. Cunningham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The only question litigated in the court below was, whether the barley was sold by the plaintiffs *210to the defendant Cunningham, or to the firm of Cunningham & Co., of which he was a member.
The appellants contend that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings, but we think there was sufficient evidence on behalf of the defendants to create a substantial conflict, and under the well-established rule we should not interfere with the findings of fact.
The plaintiffs, to establish their case against the co-partnership, relied mainly on documentary evidence, some of which they…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brailsford v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Landis v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hughes v. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Juen v. Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Jenkins v. Tuneup MastersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Sanborn v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Henry H. Cross Co. v. Bell Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.