Legal Opinion

Sanborn v. Cunningham

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1893No. 14,994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Cruz County; P. J. McCann, Judge. Action by Lucius Sanborn and William Vanderhurst, executors of the will of Charles Ford, deceased, A. A. Morey and J. S. Menasco against J. F. Cunningham, James Dougherty and Henry L. Middleton, partners trading as J. F. Cunningham & Co., for the balance of an account for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

This action was brought by Charles Ford, A. A. Morey and J. S. Menasco, copartners in the name of Charles Ford & Co., against J. F. Cunningham, James Dougherty and Henry L. Middleton, copartners in the name of J. F. Cunningham & Co., to recover $406.08, balance of an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered, alleging that the whole value of the goods sold was $906.08, of which $500 had been paid. The answer denied a sale and delivery to the defendants of goods, etc., of the aggregate value of $906.08, or of any greater value than $156.08, which last-named sum they…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. First National Bank v. OppenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Harper v. Hammond & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Jenkins v. Tuneup MastersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Singh v. CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API