Folino v. Hampden Color and Chemical Co.
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BILLINGS, District Judge.
A portion of this matter was tried before a jury in March 1993. Now, the Court must address these remaining issues: 1) defendant’s counterclaim and third-party complaint for environmental response costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., as amended (“CERCLA”); 2) defendant’s claims under the Vermont Waste Management Act, 10 V.S.A. § 6615 (‘VWMA”); and 3) plaintiffs’ claim for attorney’s fees pursuant to a lease agreement between the parties.
For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- SC Holdings, Inc. v. A.A.A. Realty Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Clear Lake Properties v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Windsor School District v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Ainger Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Stearns & Foster Bedding Co. v. Franklin Holding Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.