Legal Opinion

Taack v. Underwood

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1924No. 2347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The appellee, plaintiff in the court below, filed this suit against G. M. Wright and J. H. Taack, alleging in substance that on December 7, 1921, Wright executed and delivered to plaintiff a promissory note in the sum of $126 due October 1, 1922, bearing interest at 10 per cent., and providing for attorney’s fees, if sued upon and placed in the hands of an attorney for collection. It is further alleged that Wright executed a chattel mortgage to secure said note upon the property described as follows:

“Twenty-five acres of cotton to be planted and grown on. the T. L. & D. farm, 7 miles…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kamerick v. CastlemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Frith v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Alsbury v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Kiplinger v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Harvey v. Geo. Wilder & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API