Legal Opinion

Kamerick v. Castleman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1886PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Cooper Circuit Court, Hon. E. L„ Edwards, Judge. ‘Statement of case by the court. ' This is an action in trespass, for wrongfully entering the close of plaintiff, and the consequent loss of a crop of corn standing in the field.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Cooper Circuit Court, Hon. E. L„ Edwards, Judge. ‘Statement of case by the court. ' This is an action in trespass, for wrongfully entering the close of plaintiff, and the consequent loss of a crop of corn standing in the field. The petition alleges that the plain fciff rented from the defendant, Castleman, certain lands for the year, beginning March 1, 1884, and ending March 1, 1885. That plaintiff had cultivated 'thereon a large crop of corn, which was standing in the field, matured, on the twenty-third day of October, 1885, ■when one Parish, the constable of the township in…

1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, P. J.

I. The first question, in order of proceeding in the trial court, for determination is, the correctness of the action of the court in striking out the counter-claim. The contention of respondent is that the action is not founded on the contract of rent, but is in tort, for the wrongful entry and appropriation of plaintiff’s corn ; and that where the action is purely in tort a counter-claim predicated on contract between plaintiff and defendant is not permissible. As an abstract proposition this may be true, but the tort may be ■so connected with and dependent upon the existence •of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. People of State of N.Y. v. . DennisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Barnes v. McMullinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Smyth v. TankersleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Spooner v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. In Re Genetically Modified Rice LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
  4. Smith v. McNewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Moser v. LowerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API