Legal Opinion
Kiplinger v. Green
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error to Eaton. (Hooker, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff in this action, on the fifteenth day of September, 1883, entered into the following agreement with the defendant:
“ This agreement, made and entered into this fifteenth day of September, 1883, between Alonzo Green, of the city of Charlotte, county of Eaton, and State of Michigan, of the first part, and Jonas Kiplinger, of the second part, Wit/nesseth, that said second party hereby agrees to move onto and cultivate and farm the said first party’s farm, where he now resides, lying in the town of Eaton, and city of Charlotte, in said county, for the term of five years and five…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carpenter v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- Garwols v. Bankers Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Warren v. DriscollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Guthrie v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Hill v. GrovesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Preston v. SmallwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.