Legal Opinion

Duran v. Duran

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] On March 2, 2001, Cheryl Duran and Timothy Duran entered into a Stipulation and Agreement for a divorce. The Stipulation and Agreement divided the parties’ property and debt. Most of the marital estate subject to division was invested in Enron Corp. stock, which was held in Timothy’s employer’s stock and savings plans (the Plans). Under the Agreement, Cheryl was to receive her share of the marital property from the Plans. Timothy also wished to satisfy his liability for the marital debt from the Plans. However, Timothy could not withdraw the stock without a significant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Blare v. BlareSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Hayes v. Northern Hills General HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pesicka v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pieper v. PieperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hiller v. HillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Roseth v. RosethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Oman v. OmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Streier v. PikeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API