Oman v. Oman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of Ronda Oman’s motions for contempt and continuation of alimony and the trial court’s denial of Gregory Omaris motion to terminate alimony because of Ronda’s remarriage. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Ronda and Gregory were divorced without trial on the grounds of irreconcilable differences. As part of the divorce, the parties executed and the court adopted a Stipulation and Agreement addressing alimony, the division of property, and the care and custody of their minor child. The provision of the agreement providing for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Peterson v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Connolly v. ConnollySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Holt v. HoltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Steffens v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re the Marriage of ShimaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Urbaniak v. UrbaniakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Barton v. BartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Vandyke v. Jieun ChoiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Niemitalo v. SeidelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Condron v. CondronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.