Ohlig v. FMC Marine & Rail Equipment Division
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*588LENT, J.
The issue in this worker’s compensation case is whether the Court of Appeals should have allowed a reasonable attorney fee to the claimant’s attorney to be paid by the direct responsibility employer under ORS 656.386(1) or if the claimant’s attorney fees must be paid from his award of compensation under ORS 656.386(2).
“656.386(1) In all cases involving accidental injuries where a claimant prevails in an appeal to the Court of Appeals from a board order denying his claim for compensation, the court shall allow a reasonable attorney fee to the claimant’s attorney. In such rejected cases…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cavins v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Grudle v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Vandehey v. Pumilite Glass & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Smith v. Amalgamated Sugar CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Cavins v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Johnson v. Spectra PhysicsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Shoulders v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Short v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.