Legal Opinion

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1987No. 2077, 2078, 2086, 2087 CA A36033 (control), A36034, A36035, A36036PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Petitions for review have been filed by the City of Portland and the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission, as well as a memorandum in support of petitions filed by the League of Oregon Cities as amicus curiae. We allow the petitions and modify our former opinion in one respect. ORAP 10.10.

In our former opinion, 82 Or App 193, 728 P2d 63 (1986), we concluded by stating that ORS 199.490(2) violates Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution. That section permits a governing body to initiate an annexation by resolution after receiving the consents of a “triple…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Kmart Corp. v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API