Legal Opinion

Kmart Corp. v. Lloyd

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 1998No. 94-00752; CA A97660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

In this review from a Workers’ Compensation Board’s order on remand, employer urges application of ORS 656.262(10) 1 as amended in July 1997, to reverse the Board’s ruling that employer is barred from denying claimant’s right knee condition. Claimant raises a constitutional challenge to the amendment under the Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause, Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution. We reject the challenge and reverse and remand based on the retroactive application of ORS 656.262(10). 2

In April 1986, claimant stepped in a hole in employer’s parking lot and injured a toe on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sealey v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kmart Corp. v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Southern Wasco County Ambulance Service, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API