Legal Opinion

Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1989No. A8711-06867; CA A48513PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiffs in this declaratory judgment action challenge the constitutionality of Oregon Laws 1987, chapter 818, section 3, which provides, in pertinent part:

“Notwithstanding any other provision [ORS chapter 199] or ORS chapter 222, territory annexed or transferred to a city or district by a minor boundary change approved by a boundary commission’s final order adopted after January 1, 1985, but before the effective date of this 1987 Act shall be in the annexing city or district by operation of this 1987 Act commencing upon the effective date of the boundary commission’s final order.”

The trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Donaldson v. Lane County Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-County Future Alternatives Committee v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Breen v. Oregon Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API