Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Beidleman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 18, 1947No. 32501PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
On a former appeal, a judgment quieting title to land in Anderson, avoiding a resale tax deed of 1942 to Robert R. Beidleman, because of érroneous description of land in proceedings leading to the annual sale, was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent. Beidleman et al. v. Anderson, 195 Okla. 203, 156 P. 2d 611.
After remand of the cause, Anderson, by leave of court, filed an amended petition wherein he set forth a new ground to avoid said resale tax deed.
In substance, the new ground so alleged was that plaintiff, in good faith, had sought in due time, at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- McIntosh v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Leonard v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Pyle v. Pennington Groc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Brown v. BriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Kinzy v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement SystemCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015