Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Goodwin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 22, 1937No. 27176PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.
This cause of action was commenced in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, before Honorable Win. N. Randolph, trial judge, by the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Cecil Goodwin, deceased, against the Continental Casualty Company, to recover $1,000, this being the amount of the insurance policy on the life of said Cecil Goodwin. Eor convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
In September, 1933, the plaintiff, B. W. Goodwin, as administrator of the estate of Cecil Goodwin, deceased, brought this action against the defendant to recover on an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Goodwin v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Watkins v. DunbarIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Ball v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parker v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Raymer v. First Nat. Bank of BerwynSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Anderson v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Continental Casualty Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Karen K. v. Oklahoma Department of Institutions of Social & Rehabilitative ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.