Legal Opinion
Glandon v. Searle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 10, 1966No. 38135PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Langsdorf, J. †
This is an appeal from a judgment against garnishee defendant, arising out of an action on a controverted garnishment.
On the 15th of April, 1960, Viola Searle filled out an application with an agent of Temperance Insurance Exchange for an automobile insurance policy. This policy was designed for total abstainers of alcoholic beverages and was sold at rates 15 per cent less than policies of other companies, as a consequence. Clause 21 of this policy incorporated. the application, and was a warranty by the named insured that she was a total abstainer from alcohol, and that any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Millis v. Continental Life Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Government Employees Insurance v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- New Jersey Rubber Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co. of LondonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Alton Harris and United States of America v. Angie Quinones, and Wesco Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Independent Fire Ins. Co. v. PaulekasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Williams v. Poulsbo Rural Telephone Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Opheim v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.