Legal Opinion

Williams v. Poulsbo Rural Telephone Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1976No. 44014PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

Until May 7, 1972, when it filed a statement of intent to dissolve, defendant Poulsbo Rural Telephone Association (PRTA) was a Washington corporation operating a telephone utility business. On May 28, 1971, PRTA entered into an agreement with defendant United Telephone Company of the Northwest (Northwest) and Northwest’s parent corporation, United Telecommunications, Inc. (United). PRTA agreed to transfer all of its assets to Northwest in exchange for common stock of United. Northwest was to assume all of PRTA’s liabilities and obliga tions. In conjunction with this reorganization, PRTA…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Leonard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Bayha v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nollette v. ChristiansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Marchioro v. ChaneyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lindberg v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API