State v. Alvarez-Garcia
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance. Former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine if a rational factfinder could find each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Forrester, 203 Or App 151, 153, 125 P3d 47 (2005), rev den, 341 Or 141 (2006). We affirm.
Oregon State Trooper Webster was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Affonso Bros. v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. De La RosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. VillagomezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.