Legal Opinion

State v. Alvarez-Garcia

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 16, 2007No. 04C46765; A127524PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance. Former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine if a rational factfinder could find each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Forrester, 203 Or App 151, 153, 125 P3d 47 (2005), rev den, 341 Or 141 (2006). We affirm.

Oregon State Trooper Webster was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. NessOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Affonso Bros. v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. De La RosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. VillagomezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. LeyvaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API