Legal Opinion

Callahan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1914PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The case was submitted on briefs.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Cotjrcy, J.

The plaintiff was a telephone operator in the employ of the defendant at its Oxford Exchange, so called, which was maintained on the third floor of the building numbered 15 on Oxford Street in Boston. On the second floor of this building there was a room one part of which was used as a resting room and the other part exclusively as a lunch room, the respective parts being separated from each other by screens. In this lunch room were two tables, one for seating sixteen persons and the other for seating six; a number of ordinary lunch room chairs with cane seats and bent wood backs, having a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foley v. J. R. Whipple Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Filosi v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Condon v. GahmMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Brady v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Hacker v. NitschkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Watkins v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Parsons v. Dwightstate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API