Legal Opinion
Filosi v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 20, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for $8,000. The defendant moved to set it aside on the ground that as matter of law there was no evidence to warrant it. The trial judge* so ruled, and with the consent of the parties reported the case to this court; the parties agreeing that if the ruling was erroneous judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff for $8,000 and interest from the date of the verdict and costs of suit; otherwise, judgment is to be entered for the defendant.
* Morton, J.
*409The question is, was there any evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moynihan v. Hills Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- White v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Saxe v. Walworth Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Chiuccariello v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Curtin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Callahan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Wilson v. DanielsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Cullalucca v. Plymouth Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- O'BRIEN v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.