Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 18, 1991PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*804Liacos, CJ.
This is a tort action to recover damages for injuries sustained when the defendant’s warehouse garage door fell on the plaintiff. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. A Superior Court judge denied the motion and entered judgment in accordance with the verdict. The defendant appealed. The Appeals Court affirmed the judgment. Wilson v. Honeywell, Inc., 28 Mass. App. Ct. 298 (1990). We allowed the defendant’s application for further appellate review. We affirm.
The defendant asserts three claims of error: (1) There…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Zezuski v. Jenny Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Cofske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Giles v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fenton v. BryanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Zucco v. KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.