Legal Opinion
Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 17, 1950No. 10186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
On October 22, 1943 Etten sued Lovell Manufacturing Company (Lovell) and Kauffman. A patent, No. 2,054,970 for a “Safety Release Mechanism” for power driven roll wringers of washing machines, had issued to Etten on September 22, 1936, on an application, S.N. 648,620, filed by him on December 23, 1932. Thereafter, on October 7, 1937, Etten filed an application, S.N. 167,775, for the reissue of the patent. Previous thereto, on September 3, 1935, Etten had filed an application, S.N. 38,932, for a “Wringer Release Mechanism” for power driven roll wringers of washing machines.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hackner v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Bowles v. J. J. Schmitt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Etten v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Hazeltine Corp. v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Nicholas L. Etten and Chamberlain Corporation v. Lovell Manufacturing Company and Walter L. Kauffman, 2dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955