Legal Opinion
Etten v. Kauffman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 10, 1950No. 10013PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Per curiam
The appeal at bar was taken from a judgment of the court below declaring patent No. 2,406,951 to be void and granting certain other relief to Etten which need not be detailed here. The judgment of the court, however, did not dispose of the counterclaim filed by the defendant and of all the issues raised by the plaintiff’s assertion that the defendants wefe engaged in a conspiracy which damaged the plaintiff.
Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., provides: “When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim [or] counterclaim, * * * the…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Town of Clarksville, Va. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.