Legal Opinion
Hazeltine Corp. v. Kirkpatrick
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 7, 1948No. Nos. 9488-9491PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner, Hazeltine Corporation, is the defendant in two actions pending and undetermined in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. One was brought by Crosley Corporation and the other by Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corporation. Hazeltine Corporation asks this court for writs of prohibition and mandamus directed to the Honorable William H. Kirkpatrick, a district judge specially designated to sit in the district court to hear and dispose of these actions, requiring him to vacate various orders entered by the district court in these actions on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Earle v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ex Parte Chicago, RI & Pac. Ry.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schreiber Foods, Inc. v. Beatrice Cheese, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Forman, Judge. Slick Airways, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- United States v. FerriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Luxliner P.L. Export, Co. v. RDI/Luxliner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Prop-Jets, Inc. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.