Legal Opinion

Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 9, 1955No. Docket 23560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs are bondholders of the Alton Railroad Company, which has recently gone through reorganization pursuant to § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 205. In that reorganization plaintiffs received only 37.5 per cent of the face amount of their claims, and their old bond certificates were cancelled “except for purpose of evidencing right of the bearer or registered owner to a claim, if any, against the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company.” It is this claim which the plaintiffs are now attempting to enforce as unsatisfied creditors. The defendant dominated the debtor…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Callman Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Dupont Denemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API