Resk v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs have an easement by necessity or a right of way over the defendants’ property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated April 7, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment, granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and declared that the plaintiffs do not have an easement by necessity over the defendants’ property.
*662Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Estate of BarabashNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Skrodelis v. NorbergsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Town of Pound Ridge v. GolenbockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Summers v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bogart v. RovenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ferguson v. Shu Ham LamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- WorldCom, Inc. v. PPL Prism, LLC (In Re WorldCom, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Board of Managers v. Nbm Realty Holding, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.