Bogart v. Roven
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15, inter alia, to compel the determination of claims to real property, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Paño Patsalos, J.H.O.), dated March 13, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, declared that the plaintiffs “duly own and are entitled to exercise the right of undisturbed privilege, by express grant by deed of an easement, to cross and recross the lands of the defendants . . . designated as Section 16, Block 1, Lot 30 on the Tax Map of the Town of Warwick, for full access to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Witter v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Palmer v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Green v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Clements v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fischer v. Zepa Consulting AG.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Corrarino v. ByrnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Djoganopoulos v. PolkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Panday v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Faviola, LLC v. PatelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Seven Springs, LLC v. Nature ConservancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.