Legal Opinion

Vencill v. Cornwell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1956No. 5428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment rendered on a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. By reason of failure to obtain service on William Cornwell, the case proceeded only against the defendant Goodwill Industries (herein referred to as the defendant). The principal question presented for decision involves respondeat superior.

William Cornwell, who drove defendant’s truck, which collided with plaintiff’s automobile, was employed as a truck driver’s helper — not as a truck driver. In response to a subpoena, defendant produced at the trial an office record containing a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Telinde v. the Ohio Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Breinig v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Timberman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wehrle v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorsten v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sturgell v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Fox v. Triplett Auto Wrecking, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API