Legal Opinion
21st Century Insurance v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 2009No. S154790PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*515Opinion
CHIN, J. —
Silvia Quintana (Quintana) was injured in an automobile accident with a third party. She maintained an auto insurance policy with 21st Century Insurance Company (21st Century) that included first party, no-fault medical payment (med-pay) insurance coverage in case of an accident. 21st Century paid Quintana $1,000 under her insurance policy’s med-pay provision. Quintana then separately pursued a damages claim against the third party and settled the action for $6,000, which sum represented her total damages. In obtaining the settlement, she incurred approximately $2,000 in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carson v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Rony v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Eisen v. Tavangarian, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Robinson v. HSBC BANK USADistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.