Legal Opinion
Roy Browning and Ena R. Browning v. Allied Helicopter Service, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1962No. 6957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
The controversy here results from an oral contract between appellants and ap-pellee, whereby appellee agreed to spray, from the air, certain lands belonging to appellants for the purpose of killing timber and brush.
The action was originally filed in state court, with appellee, Allied Helicopter Service, Inc., 1 as plaintiff, to recover, under the oral contract, from appellants, Roy and Ena R. Browning, 2 as defendants, for the spraying services performed. The case was removed to the court below, trial was had to the court, without a jury, and resulted in a judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peaceable Creek Coal Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Harriss v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- American Tank & Equipment Co. v. T. E. Wiggins, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Green v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Statser v. Chickasaw Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- The Permian Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Armco Steel Corporation, and Frank J. Gehrer and Hazel J. Ross, and Classic Mining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Dixon v. Kelley (In Re Producers Energy Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981