Legal Opinion
American Tank & Equipment Co. v. T. E. Wiggins, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 27, 1934No. 22710PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties appear as in the trial court and the plaintiff in error, American Tank & Equipment Company, will be referred to as the plaintiff, the defend-' ant T. E. Wiggins, Inc., will be referred to as the defendant contractor, and the defendant Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company will be referred to as the railway company.
The plaintiff alleged in its petition that prior to July 15, 1929, the defendant contractor entered into a contract in writing with the railway company, to build, construct, equip, and complete a roadbed for the tracks of the railway company near the southwest…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Marathon Paper Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Basshor v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Chamberlain v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Amtech Lighting Services Co. v. Payless Cashways (In Re Payless Cashways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. Bohmar Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Davidson Oil Country Supply Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Eqpt. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.