Legal Opinion
Peaceable Creek Coal Co. v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 8, 1910No. 678PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; P. B. Cole, Judge. Action by Andrew Jackson and others against the Peaceable Creek Coal Company and others. From the judgment, defendants bring error. Copies of briefs did not reach the reporter.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
1. The first question for determination is as do the right of certain plaintiffs and interveners to have recognized .and enforced, by virtue of sections 4817, 4818 (sections 6151, 6152, ■Comp. Laws Okla. 1909) Wilson’s Eev. & Ann. St. 1903, a claim for a lien on a coal mine, machinery, equipment, and fixtures thereof. Section 3018 of the Code of Alabama of 1886 provides:
“Every mechanic or other person who shall do or perform .any work or labor upon, or furnish any material, fixtures, engine, boiler or machinery, for any building or improvement on land, or for repairing the same, under or by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chauncey v. Dyke Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Davis v. BilslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Eufaula Water Co. v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Bates v. HarteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- First National Bank of Pauls Valley v. CrudupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Green v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Newman v. KirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Midland Mortgage Co. v. Sanders England InvestmentsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.