Legal Opinion

Harriss v. Parks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1920No. 9503PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; Geo. C. Crump, Assigned Judge. Action by F. C. Parks against F. R. Har-riss and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and Harriss bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for the recovery of money and to enforce a lien against real estate, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against Sim Kill-crease and the plaintiff in error, F. R. Har-riss, defendants below. Sim Killcrease made default and took no part in the trial of the • cause, the issues being joined between the plaintiff and the defendant Harriss.

Upon trial to the court personal judgment was rendered against Sim Killcrease and a decree entered declaring the same to be a lien upon the land described in plaintiff’s petition. It is to reverse the latter part of this…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Kratz v. KratzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. Bohmar Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Landers v. Bank of Commerce of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. BuseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API